[MA-RPC] Proposed by-laws for operation of the MARPC

[Frank Bohn]

Hal and Walt,

Thanks for the responses.  The wording includes "holder of another club
leadership position" with the intention of giving flexibility to clubs.  Its
intent is to assure that club representatives have a history with the clubs
and know the issues and concerns that arise.  For the moment I want to leave
the provision in the draft, but at the meeting you can propose either
deletion or alternate wording, and the committee as a whole can decide.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: ma-rpc-bounces at commerce-02.cilia.org
[mailto:ma-rpc-bounces at commerce-02.cilia.org]On Behalf Of Hal Wright
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:43 PM
To: 'MA-RPC mailing list'
Subject: Re: [MA-RPC] Proposed by-laws for operation of the MARPC


I agree with Walt. The clubs are in the best position to decide who
qualified candidates are. Let them make the choice, as  long as the
participants are members of ATC and the maintaining club.

On Jan 3, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Walt Daniels wrote:

> Very good.
>
> I have a slight problem with section II where it restricts
> representatives
> and alternates to being club officers, directors or other club
> leadership
> position. NYNJTC has no directors and the club is too big for picking
> an
> officer who are more concerned with the other 90% of the trails we
> maintain
> than the AT. What we have is Trail Committee Chairs and Supervisors for
> various regions of trails. Even Supervisors are responsible for more AT
> miles than a number of official AT maintaining clubs. I think this
> requirement needs to be a bit less specific and rely on the clubs to
> pick
> appropriate people.
>