[MA-RPC] Draft Communication Plan

[Walt Daniels]

Yes, but think how much less work it would be for the clubs to only write a
short paragraph about where they differ from the standard, e.g. offset vs
inline blazing. It would also be much easier for the reviewers as they would
only have to approve small differences rather than try to judge if a
complete rewording of the standard was equivalent to it or differed in some
small but consequential fashion. The assessment no longer belongs in the LMP
as it needs yearly updating to comply with the NPS budgeting process. Most
of the assessment is not even suited to printing as it is really a
relational database. It could be treated much like a treasurers report, i.e.
the treasurer does not print out all the bookkeeping data, but just a
balance sheet and some notes about what is significant.


   _____  

From: HikeSperry at aol.com [mailto:HikeSperry at aol.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:33 PM
To: wdhiker at optonline.net; MA-RPC at commerce-02.cilia.org
Subject: Re: [MA-RPC] Draft Communication Plan


There is a standard LMP that clubs use as a guideline. Mountain Club Md just
used SATC's plan and adapted it as it made a good fit for them.
Thyra


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 1/21/2005



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 1/21/2005
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nynjtc.org/mailman/private/ma-rpc/attachments/20050122/3b7e425c/attachment.htm