[MA-RPC] RE: Proposed accessibility directives

[Walt Daniels]

Sorry, but the public at large does not agree with your view of the world.
Without changing the public's view there is NO chance of your proposal being
taken seriously. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Hooper [mailto:james.hooper at worldnet.att.net] 
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:47 AM
> To: Walt Daniels
> Cc: 'Kerry Snow'; MA-RPC at commerce-02.cilia.org; 'Susan Daniels'
> Subject: Re: [MA-RPC] RE: Proposed accessibility directives
> 
> I should be a right for access to public building such as 
> court houses.... but not wilderness areas.
> 
> Walt Daniels wrote:
> 
> >>I think the AT should be exempt from all of these 
> requirements.  That 
> >>would take congressional action!
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >At the very least it would take Congressional action. But it is 
> >actually much deeper than that. It would take a fundamental 
> change in 
> >the mindset of most people who think that ADA access is a right.  
> >Without a change in the mindset, congress would not act.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.4 - Release Date: 3/18/2005
>  
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.4 - Release Date: 3/18/2005